Planning applicationSLK/P/26/0961

Hagshaw Hill III Wind Farm Opencast Mine At Poniel - Access Roads Douglas

RegisteredWorth watchingRenewable Energy & Sustainability
Official records · coverage in progress

1,134 of 1,211 official records received 1 Sept 2025 – 31 Aug 2026 were available when checked on 6 Sept 2026. 77 records from that period are still being added or checked.

Proposals and decisions come from South Lanarkshire Council. Additional summaries and analysis are being added where verified.

Check the council’s planning register
Location map
© MapTiler © OpenStreetMap contributors
Received

29 July 2026

Validated

31 July 2026

Planning Signals

3 detected traits

Specific
Section 36 ConsentWind TurbineWind Turbine Count 8
AI summary

Proposed energy project with 8 turbines, solar array, and battery storage for consultation.

Impact scale

Estimated scale of impact on the surrounding area.

9/10
DISCUSSION

No comments yet

Be the first to share your local perspective on this application.

CityScope · Planning Updates

Application SLK/P/26/0961

Hagshaw Hill III Wind Farm Opencast Mine At Poniel - Access Roads Douglas

RegisteredRenewable Energy, EV & Heat PumpsReceived South Lanarkshire Council

Proposed energy project with 8 turbines, solar array, and battery storage for consultation.

Reference
SLK/P/26/0961
Address
Hagshaw Hill III Wind Farm Opencast Mine At Poniel - Access Roads Douglas
Status
Registered
Category
Renewable Energy, EV & Heat Pumps
Impact scale
9/10
Authority
South Lanarkshire Council
Received
Validated
Last scraped
Record created
Latitude
55.5654
Longitude
-3.8708

Plain-language summary

Proposed energy project with 8 turbines, solar array, and battery storage for consultation.

As filed with the council

Section 36 Consultation relating to the Hagshaw Hill III Energy Project, comprising 8 wind turbines, Solar Array and Long Duration Battery Storage System.

City Scope Journal

Hagshaw Hill III archaeology proposals accepted ahead of further design work

A specialist response says the proposed measures for physical archaeological impacts are acceptable, while leaving the final archaeological response to later design work.

Read the Journal article →